U.S. v. FARRELL

Case No. 2:12-CR-0076 TLN.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEAN FARRELL, and ETHAN STUART, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Jason Hitt , United States Attorney's Office & Kevin Christopher Khasigian , United States Attorney's Office.


GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT AND ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

The United States of America, through its attorney of record, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby moves for an order dismissing the Indictment against defendants Sean FARRELL and Ethan STUART in Case No. 2:12-CR-0076 TLN pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a).

The government brings this motion in the interests of justice because each defendant entered guilty pleas in Nevada County Superior Court to criminal charges related to this case and, as part of that agreement, agreed to forfeiture in a case captioned United States v. Real Property located at 25818 Burda Lane, California, Case 2:12-CV-00813 WBS EFB. Those guilty pleas and that forfeiture were the result of a global resolution reached with counsel for each defendant, the United States Attorney's Office, and the Nevada County District Attorney's Office. Consistent with the agreement, the United States agreed to dismiss this pending Indictment in exchange for each defendants' guilty pleas to in Nevada County Superior Court and the certain, specified forfeiture.

Because defendants have met all of the necessary conditions set forth in the settlement agreement, the United States respectfully moves to dismiss the Indictment against defendants Sean FARRELL and Ethan STUART in Case No. 2:12-CR-0076 TLN in the interests of justice pursuant to Rule 48(a).

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the motion to dismiss the Indictment filed by the United States, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Indictment in Case No. 2:12-CR-0076 TLN against defendant Sean FARRELL and Ethan STUART is hereby DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a).


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases