RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO"). Dkt. # 28. Defendants Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC and U.S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2013 SC3 Title Trust ("Defendants") oppose the motion. Dkt. # 32.
Plaintiff initiated this matter on March 23, 2017 with an unsuccessful TRO seeking to enjoin Defendants from foreclosing on her Shoreline property.
To obtain preliminary injunctive relief, Plaintiff must "establish that [she] is likely to succeed on the merits, that [she] is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in [her] favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest." Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 129 S.Ct. 365, 374 (2008). The standard for a temporary restraining order is substantially the same. ProtectMarriage.com — Yes on 8 v. Courage Campaign, 680 F.Supp.2d 1225, 1228 (E.D. Cal. 2010) (citing Winter); Stuhlbarg Int'l Sales Co. v. John D. Brush & Co., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 (9th Cir. 2001) (noting that preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order standards are "substantially identical").
Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend her complaint is not ripe. Dkt. # 19. Accordingly, this TRO must proceed on the facts of her original Complaint. The Court already found that Plaintiff failed to meet her burden to show success on the merits based on this Complaint. Dkt. # 9.
Plaintiff's Motion is