2255 MEMORANDUM OPINION
JACKSON L. KISER Senior District Judge.
David Servin-Terrasas, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The government filed a motion to dismiss, and the time within which Servin-Terrasas had to respond has expired, making this matter ripe for consideration. After reviewing the record, I conclude that the government's motion to dismiss must be granted and Servin-Terrasas' § 2255 motion must be dismissed as untimely.
On January 18, 2006, a federal grand jury charged Servin-Terrasa in a seven-count indictment with various drug distribution crimes and firearm possession crimes. On June 1, 2006, Servin-Terrasas pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to possession with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 841(b)(1)(A) ("Count Five"), and to using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of, a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) ("Count Six"). Plea Agree, at 2, ECF No. 24. The government agreed to dismiss the remaining counts.
The Presentence Investigation Report ("PSR") recommended, for Count Five, a total offense level of 29, a criminal history category of I, and an imprisonment range of 87 to 108 months. PSR ¶ 58, ECF No. 37. However because the statutory mandatory minimum for the drag charge was 120 months, Servin-Terrasas' guideline range for that count became 120 months. For Count Six, the mandatory minimum and maximum term was five years to life imprisonment, to be served consecutively to any other sentence imposed.
On September 5, 2006, I sentenced Servin-Terrasas to the mandatory minimum 120 months for Count Five and the mandatory minimum 60 months for Count Six, to run consecutively, for a total of 180 months' imprisonment. Judgment at 2, ECF No. 28. Servin-Terrasas appealed; the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction and sentence.
On June 20, 2016, Servin-Terrasas filed this § 2255 motion alleging that I imposed an unconstitutional sentence in light of
To state a viable claim for relief under § 2255, a petitioner must prove: (1) that his sentence was "imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States;" (2) that "the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence;" or (3) that "the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack." 28 U.S.C. § 2255(a). Servin-Terrasas bears the burden of proving grounds for a collateral attack by a preponderance of the evidence.
A. The ACCA Enhanced Sentence Structure
Federal law prohibits convicted felons from possessing firearms. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Defendants who violate this law are subject to a term of up to ten years' imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2). However, when defendants convicted of a § 922(g) charge have three or more prior convictions for "serious drug offenses" or "violent felonies," they qualify as armed career criminals under the ACCA. Armed career criminals face an increased punishment: a statutory mandatory minimum of fifteen years' imprisonment and a maximum of life. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1).
18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B). In
Johnson Claim and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
Servin-Terrasas claims that his conviction for using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of, a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), was invalidated by
Federal law provides for a separate consecutive sentence if any person uses or carries a firearm during and in relation to
Accordingly, whether or not the definition of "crime of violence" survives constitutional muster in light of
For the reasons stated, I will grant the government's motion to dismiss.