VICE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Civil Action No. 3:16-CV-271.

RODNEY KEITH VICE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nature of Suit: 863 Social Security: DIWC / DIWW
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rodney Keith Vice, Plaintiff, represented by Julie L. Glover , Glover Luck, LLP.


ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

GEORGE C. HANKS, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiff has requested leave to appear in forma pauperis in this appeal from a decision regarding Social Security benefits. Dkt. 3.

Plaintiff states that he receives long term disability payments of $3,900 per month, owns a vehicle, has $1,000 in a savings account, and that his assets include 16 acres of land that he values at $134,000. His list of expenses amounts to $1,700 per month, and includes a $600 monthly payment on an "adjoining tract of land," $500 per month on credit card debt, and $100 per month for cable television.

After reviewing the application, and considering the applicable authorities, the Court finds that the application should be DENIED.

"The mere execution of an affidavit of indigence does not automatically entitle a litigant to proceed in forma pauperis." Heath v. I.R.S., 2002 WL 31086069, at *1 (N.D. Tex. 2002) (citing Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 335 U.S. 331, 337 (1948); Green v. Estelle, 649 F.2d 298, 302 (5th Cir. Unit A June 1981); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)). "While plaintiff does not need to be absolutely destitute to qualify for in forma pauperis status, such benefit is allowed only when plaintiff cannot give such costs and remain able to provide for himself and his dependents." Bright v. Hickman, 96 F.Supp.2d 572, 575 (E.D. Tex. 2000) (citing Adkins, 335 U.S. at 339); see also Mitchell v. Champs Sports, 42 F.Supp.2d 642, 648 (E.D. Tex. 1998).

In light of the foregoing, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff has sixty (60) days to pay the filing fee in this cause; all of the costs associated with the filing of this lawsuit should be paid on or before August 14, 2017. If Plaintiff does not object to this recommendation, and further does not pay the filing fee by August 14, 2017, this case be dismissed without prejudice with no further notice to Plaintiff.

Further, Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. 2, is DENIED as moot.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases