BAGLEY v. PennyMAC CORP.

No. 3:16-CV-00420-N(BF).

CLARESA BAGLEY, Plaintiff, v. PENNYMAC CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Claresa Bagley, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

PennyMac Corp, Defendant, represented by Walter McInnis , Akerman LLP, C. Charles Townsend , Akerman LLP & Lauren Elizabeth Hayes , Akerman LLP.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DAVID C. GODBEY, District Judge.

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney dated May 1, 2017. The Court reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 24] is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims shall be dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases