PAVECON HOLDING CO., INC. v. TUZINSKI

Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-888.

PAVECON HOLDING CO., INC., ET AL., v. RICK W. TUZINSKI, ET AL.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Cause: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 On - going Damage to Computer Data
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pavecon Holding Co., Inc., Plaintiff, represented by James Robert Arnett, II , Carter Scholer Arnett Hamada & Mockler PLLC.

Pavecon Holding Co., Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Joshua James Bennett , Carter Scholer Arnett Hamada & Mockler PLLC.

Pavecon Ltd. Co., Plaintiff, represented by James Robert Arnett, II , Carter Scholer Arnett Hamada & Mockler PLLC & Joshua James Bennett , Carter Scholer Arnett Hamada & Mockler PLLC.

Pavecon Public Works LP, Plaintiff, represented by James Robert Arnett, II , Carter Scholer Arnett Hamada & Mockler PLLC & Joshua James Bennett , Carter Scholer Arnett Hamada & Mockler PLLC.

Rick W Tuzinski, Defendant, represented by Martin Edward Rose , Rose Walker, LLP.

Kansas Asphalt, Inc., Defendant, represented by Martin Edward Rose , Rose Walker, LLP.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AMOS L. MAZZANT, III, District Judge.

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 19, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #51) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants' Motion to Join Labcon, Inc. as a Party Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 19(a) (Dkt. #28) be denied.

Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Join Labcon, Inc. as a Party Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 19(a) (Dkt. #28) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases