CATHY BISSOON, District Judge.
Ricky Smyrnes (the "Petitioner") has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In 2013, he was tried in the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County on charges related to the kidnapping and murder of Jennifer Lee Daugherty. A jury convicted him of first-degree murder, conspiracy, kidnapping and related crimes. Following a separate penalty hearing, the jury returned a sentence of death on his first-degree murder conviction.
The Petitioner pursued a direct appeal with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. On February 22, 2017, that Court issued a decision affirming his judgment of sentence.
On April 12, 2017, the Petitioner filed in the Court of Common Pleas a motion for collateral relief pursuant to Pennsylvania's Post Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA"), in which he claims that his trial counsel provided him with ineffective assistance in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights. He claims also that there is newly-discovered exculpatory evidence. (Petition, ¶ 11(a)). On May 4, 2017, the Court of Common Pleas appointed Thomas N. Farrell, Esq., to represent the Petitioner and issued a scheduling order setting forth the due date for a counseled amended PCRA petition. (5/4/17 docket entries on Criminal Docket Sheet in
On or around June 2, 2017, this Court received for filing the Petitioner's pro se petition for habeas relief, which is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
A federal habeas petitioner must complete the exhaustion of his available state court remedies before a federal district court may determine the merits of his habeas claims. This exhaustion requirement is codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A), and provides:
The requirement is "grounded in principles of comity; in a federal system, the States should have the first opportunity to address and correct alleged violations of state prisoner's federal rights."
The general rule is that a district court must dismiss a federal habeas petition if the petitioner is exhausting his available state remedies.
For the reasons stated above, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is summarily DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.