TECHINOMICS, INC. v. FOREST POWER & ENERGY HOLDING, INC.

Civil Action No. 16-1859.

TECHINOMICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. FOREST POWER & ENERGY HOLDING, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Other Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

TECHINOMICS, INC., Plaintiff, represented by Ryan D. DeMotte , Cafardi Ferguson Wyrick Weis + Stotler llc.

TECHINOMICS, INC., Plaintiff, represented by William J. Wyrick , Cafardi Ferguson Wyrick Weis + Stotler llc.

FOREST POWER & ENERGY HOLDING, INC., Defendant, represented by Kenneth M. Argentieri , Duane Morris LLP & Yuanyou Yang , Duane Morris LLP.

FOREST POWER & ENERGY HOLDING, INC., Counter Claimant, represented by Kenneth M. Argentieri , Duane Morris LLP & Yuanyou Yang , Duane Morris LLP.

TECHINOMICS, INC., Counter Defendant, represented by Ryan D. DeMotte , Cafardi Ferguson Wyrick Weis + Stotler llc & William J. Wyrick , Cafardi Ferguson Wyrick Weis + Stotler llc.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

CATHY BISSOON, District Judge.

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On May 11, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 12) recommending that that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims (Doc. 8) be denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made, and Plaintiff has filed Objections. See Doc. 13.

After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, the following Order is entered:

Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims (Doc. 8) is DENIED, and the Report and Recommendation hereby is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases