Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Ronald Satish Emrit, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
Lycoming Housing Authority, Defendant, represented by Bret J. Southard , Casale & Bonner, P.C. & John R. Bonner , Casale & Bonner, P.C..
U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development, Defendant, represented by George Michael Thiel , U.S. Attorney's Office.
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
Before the Court for disposition is a Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr. on May 17, 2017.1 In this Report, Magistrate Judge Saporito recommended that (1) Defendants U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Lycoming Housing Authority's pending motions to dismiss be granted; (2) Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit's complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1); and (3) the Clerk be directed to close this case.2 No objections to this Report and Recommendation have since been filed.
Upon designation, a magistrate judge may "conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and . . . submit to a judge of the court proposed findings of fact and recommendations."3 Once filed, this Report and Recommendation is disseminated to the parties in the case who then have the opportunity to file written objections.4 Where no objection is made to a report and recommendation, the court should, as a matter of good practice, "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation."5 Nevertheless, whether timely objections are made or not, the district court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.6
Following independent review of the record, I am satisfied that the Report and Recommendation contains no clear facial error. In the interests of judicial economy, I will not rehash Magistrate Judge Saporito's sound reasoning and legal citation. The Court is in full agreement that Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit's Complaint has failed to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) with respect to Lycoming Housing Authority, lacks subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) with respect to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and should be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.7
AND NOW, therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr.'s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22) is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY;
2. Defendants Lycoming Housing Authority and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 9 & 15) are GRANTED;
3. The Clerk of Courts is directed to close this case.