VIGDOR v. SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC.

Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG.

DAN VIGDOR, an individual; STEPHEN BRADWAY, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC., a California corporation (formerly known as 12 GIGS, INC.); NICHOLAS TALARICO, an individual; DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Other Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dan Vigdor, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin Horwitz , Michelman and Robinson.

Dan Vigdor, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew F. Murray , Michelman Robinson & Marc Russell Jacobs , Michelman Robinson LLP.

Stephen Bradway, Plaintiff, represented by Benjamin Horwitz , Michelman and Robinson, Matthew F. Murray , Michelman Robinson & Marc Russell Jacobs , Michelman Robinson LLP.

Super Lucky Casino, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benedict Y. Hur , Attorney at Law & Julia Lees Allen , Keker Van Nest & Peters LLP.

Nicholas Talarico, Defendant, represented by Benedict Y. Hur , Attorney at Law & Julia Lees Allen , Keker Van Nest & Peters LLP.


STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO LIFT PSLRA STAY AND PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO REPLY AND ORDER

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.

The undersigned parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a complaint in the above-entitled action in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, on September 16, 2016 (the "Complaint") and filed the Certificate of Service of the Complaint on Defendants on October 5, 2016;

WHEREAS, on October 13, 2016, Defendants filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), which extended Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint 18 days to November 1, 2016;

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on November 1, 2016, scheduled for hearing on January 19, 2017;

WHEREAS, on November 15, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to File First Amended Complaint and Vacate Motion to Dismiss Hearing Date Upon Filing of First Amended Complaint, which extended Plaintiffs' time to file the First Amended Complaint 7 days to November 29, 2016 and Defendants' deadline to file a response to the First Amended Complaint to December 15, 2016;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on November 29, 2016;

WHEREAS, on December 7, 2016, Defendants filed a Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants to Respond to First Amended Complaint, which extended Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint 7 days to December 22, 2016 and extended Plaintiffs' time to file any opposition 7 days to January 12, 2017;

WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint on December 22, 2016, scheduled for hearing on March 2, 2017;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to File Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, and To Extend Time to File Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Response on December 23, 2016, and pursuant to stipulation, on December 27, 2016, the Court extended Plaintiffs' deadline to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 12 days to January 17, 2017 and Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Response 12 days to January 24, 2017;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Motion and Notice of Motion to Partially Lift PSLRA Discovery Stay to Conduct Limited Scope Discovery on May 26, 2017 with a hearing date of July 6, 2017;

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES that, provided that the July 6, 2017 hearing date remains unchanged, Defendants' time to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion and Notice of Motion to Partially Lift PSLRA Discovery Stay to Conduct Limited Scope Discovery ("Plaintiffs' Motion") is extended seven days, up to and including June 16, 2017, and Plaintiffs' time to file their reply in support of Plaintiffs' Motion is extended seven days, up to and including June 23, 2017. This stipulation alters the date of the deadlines fixed by the court on May 26, 2017, which ordered Defendants' Response due by June 9, 2017 and Plaintiffs' Replies due by June 16, 2017. Plaintiffs agreed to this stipulation expressly subject to the condition that and only if this stipulation does not impact or cause to be changed the July 6, 2017 hearing date on Plaintiffs' Motion.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that all signatories have concurred in its filing.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

AS STIPULATED BY:

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, Defendants' time to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion and Notice of Motion to Partially Lift PSLRA Discovery Stay to Conduct Limited Scope Discovery is extended to June 16, 2017, and Plaintiffs' time to file their reply in support of Plaintiffs' Motion is extended to June 23, 2017. The hearing date shall remain July 6, 2017 as originally noticed.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases