HERNANDEZ v. QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION

Case No. 3:17-cv-02577.

LEAH ANN HERNANDEZ and JOSE RAMON HERNANDEZ, Plaintiffs, v. QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION, QBE AMERICAS, INC., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - (Citizenship)
Nature of Suit: 110 Insurance
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LEAH ANN HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, represented by Ethan A. Glaubiger , Ethan A. Glaubiger Law Offices.

Jose Ramon Hernandez, Plaintiff, represented by Ethan A. Glaubiger , Ethan A. Glaubiger Law Offices.

QBE Insurance Corporation, Defendant, represented by Rebecca R. Weinreich , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP & Gerald Max Garcia , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard Smith LLP.

QBE Americas, Inc., Defendant, represented by Rebecca R. Weinreich , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP & Gerald Max Garcia , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard Smith LLP.


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW LATE FILING OF OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE AND TO CONTINUE THE JUNE 20, 2017 HEARINGS ON THE MOTIONS

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Come now, Plaintiffs LEAH ANN HERNANDEZ and JOSE RAMON HERNANDEZ ("Plaintiffs") and defendants QBE PRAETORIAN INSURANCE CORPORATION AND QBE AMERICAS, INC. ("QBE") and stipulate as follows.

QBE filed a motion to dismiss and a motion to strike on May 11, 2017 and set both motions for hearing on June 20, 2107;

Plaintiffs' oppositions to both motions were due on May 25, 2017;

As of today, Plaintiffs have not filed any oppositions;

On May 31, 2017, Plaintiffs' counsel called QBE's counsel and advised that he had inadvertently failed to properly calendar the deadline to file oppositions because his assistant had been unexpectedly out of the office;

During the May 31, 2017 conversation, QBE's counsel asked Plaintiffs' counsel to provide a proposed stipulation supporting Plaintiffs' request for leave to late file oppositions; and

On June 2, 2017, Plaintiffs' counsel provided a proposed stipulation and proposed order to defense counsel.

Now therefore, subject to this Court's approval, Plaintiffs and QBE ask this Court to continue the deadline for Plaintiffs to file oppositions to both motions from May 25, 2017 to June 12, 2017 and continue the deadline for QBE to file reply briefs to June 19, 2017. To accommodate Plaintiffs' counsel's vacation, Plaintiffs and QBE also ask this Court to continue the hearing on both motions to July 11, 2017. SO STIPULATED

[PROPOSED] ORDER

In accordance with the above stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that plaintiffs shall have leave to file oppositions to defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike. Opposition to both motions shall be filed not later than June 12, 2017 and any replies shall be filed not later than June 16, 2017.

The hearing on both motions shall be continued to July 13, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases