PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES - SHASTA, LLC v. PRICE

Nos. 2:17-cv-00431-MCE-CMK, 2:17-cv-00071-TLN-KJN, 2:17-cv-00073-TLN-KJN, 2:17-cv-00082-TLN-KJN, 2:17-cv-00069-TLN-KJN, 2:17-cv-00074-TLN-KJN, 2:17-cv-00072-TLN-KJN

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES — SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Shasta Regional Medical Center, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS E. PRICE, M.D., in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES — SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Shasta Regional Medical Center, Plaintiff, v. SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES — SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Shasta Regional Medical Center, Plaintiff, v. SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES — SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Shasta Regional Medical Center, Plaintiff, v. SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES — SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Shasta Regional Medical Center, Plaintiff, v. SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES — SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Shasta Regional Medical Center, Plaintiff, v. SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES — SHASTA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Shasta Regional Medical Center, Plaintiff, v. SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Nature of Suit: 899 Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act / Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Bryan Wong , Prime Healthcare Services, Inc..

Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Defendant, represented by Philip A. Scarborough , Office of the United States Attorney.

Tom Price, Defendant, represented by Joseph Frueh , United States Attorney's Office & Philip A. Scarborough , Office of the United States Attorney.

Thomas E. Price, M.D., Defendant, represented by Joseph Frueh , United States Attorney's Office.


ORDER RELATING CASES

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a) (E.D. Cal. 1997). The actions involve the same parties, are based on the same claims, the same questions of fact and the same questions of law, and would therefore entail a substantial duplication of labor if heard by different judges. Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of judicial effort.

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are assigned to the same judge. No consolidation of the actions is affected. Under the regular practice of this Court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated 2:17-cv-00431-MCE-CMK is hereby reassigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all further proceedings. Any dates currently set in the reassigned case are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:17-cv-00431-TLN-KJN.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court make appropriate adjustments in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases