1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. STATE v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
 

STATE v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

No. 15-cv-1136 (KBF).

THE STATE OF NEW YORK and THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 25, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cause: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The State Of New York, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Kin Leung , New York State Office of the Attorney General.

The State Of New York, Plaintiff, represented by Dana Hope Biberman , New York State Office of The Attorney General, Tatyana A. Trakht , New York State Office of The Attorney General, Isaac C. Cheng , New York State Office of the Attorney General, John P. Oleske , Office of the Attorney General, John Turrettini , Office of New York State Attorney General, Kevin M. Lynch , N.Y.S. Office of The Attorney General, pro hac vice & Lilia Isobel Toson , New York City Law Department.

The City Of New York,, Plaintiff, represented by Eric Proshansky , NYC Law Department, Christopher Kin Leung , New York State Office of the Attorney General, John P. Oleske , Office of the Attorney General, Lilia Isobel Toson , New York City Law Department & Tonya Jenerette , Corporation Counsel, Special Federal Litigation Division.

United Parcel Service, Inc., Defendant, represented by Carrie Heather Cohen , U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY, Deanne E. Maynard , Morrison & Foerster LLP, pro hac vice, Gregory B. Koltun , Morrison & Foerster, pro hac vice, Jamie A. Levitt , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Mark David McPherson , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Natalie Anne Fleming Nolen , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Paul T. Friedman , Morrison & Foerster LLP, pro hac vice, Ruth N. Borenstein , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Amanda Aikman , Morrison & Foerster LLP & Kendall Manlove , Morrison & Foerster LLP.

OPINION & ORDER

This case was tried to the bench on September 19, 2016, through September 29, 2016. Following the trial, on March 24, 2017, the Court issued a preliminary Opinion & Order setting forth, inter alia, its findings of fact and conclusions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases