1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KELLY v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 

KELLY v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Civil Case No. 3:16-cv-00543 (VLB).

DAVID KELLY, RICHARD NORKO, ANNETTE DOBBS, PETER DELLOLIO, Plaintiffs, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

May 25, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Nature of Suit: 720 Labor: Labor / Mgt. Relations
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Kelly, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas W. Meiklejohn , Livingston, Adler, Pulda, Meiklejohn & Kelly.

David Kelly, Plaintiff, represented by William Wertheimer , Law Office of William Wetheimer, pro hac vice.

Richard Norko, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas W. Meiklejohn , Livingston, Adler, Pulda, Meiklejohn & Kelly & William Wertheimer , Law Office of William Wetheimer, pro hac vice.

Annette Dobbs, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas W. Meiklejohn , Livingston, Adler, Pulda, Meiklejohn & Kelly & William Wertheimer , Law Office of William Wetheimer, pro hac vice.

Peter Dellolio, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas W. Meiklejohn , Livingston, Adler, Pulda, Meiklejohn & Kelly & William Wertheimer , Law Office of William Wetheimer, pro hac vice.

Honeywell International Inc., Defendant, represented by Abbey M. Glenn , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, pro hac vice, Brian T. Ortelere , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, pro hac vice, Donald L. Havermann , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, pro hac vice, Sean K. McMahan , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, pro hac vice & Christopher M. Wasil , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [DKT. 70]

Plaintiffs filed the instant motion for reconsideration upon the Court entering judgment in favor of Defendant with respect to "Subclass B," retirees who retired after the expiration of the collective bargaining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases