PASKINS v. PIERCE

Civ. No. 15-147-SLR.

253 F.Supp.3d 753 (2017)

Daniel M. PASKINS, Jr., Petitioner, v. David PIERCE, Warden, and Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Respondents.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

Signed May 24, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General)
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel M. Paskins, Jr. Pro se petitioner.

Gregory E. Smith , Deputy Attorney General, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, Delaware. Counsel for respondents.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

I. INTRODUCTION

Petitioner Daniel M. Paskins Jr. ("petitioner") filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ("application"). (D.I. 1) For the reasons that follow, the court will deny petitioner's § 2254 application.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases