No. 1:16-cv-00393-RB-LF.

"ROCKY" ROQUE DE LA FUENTE GUERRA, Plaintiff, v. MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, New Mexico Secretary of State, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Mexico.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roque De La Fuente Guerra, Plaintiff, represented by Ray Twohig , Ray Twohig PC.

Roque De La Fuente Guerra, Plaintiff, represented by Paul A. Rossi , IMPG Advocates, Inc., pro hac vice.

Maggie Toulouse Oliver, Defendant, represented by Dylan Kenneth Lange , New Mexico Office of the Attorney General.


LAURA FASHING, Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 42). Plaintiff filed a response (Doc. 43), and the time for defendant to file a reply has now passed. Having reviewed the motion, response, and the applicable law, the Court finds the motion moot, and it will be DENIED.

In the motion to compel, defendant asks the Court to require plaintiff to answer Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production of Documents. Doc. 42 at 1. Defendant's counsel admits in the motion that he conferred with plaintiff's attorney Paul Rossi, and agreed not to file the motion to compel as long as plaintiff produced answers and responses by the close of business on Friday, April 21, 2017. Id. at 2. In the response, Mr. Rossi states that he delivered plaintiff's answers and responses at 12:30 p.m. on April 21, 2017— before the agreed-upon deadline.1 The Court therefore finds the Motion to Compel moot, and declines to award attorney fees and costs.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery is DENIED AS MOOT.


1. The Albuquerque Attorney General's Office accepted service of the answers and responses, and advised Mr. Rossi that they would notify Mr. Lange of this fact. See Doc. 43 at 2. It appears that this notification was not timely made.


1000 Characters Remaining reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases