No. 16-0908V.


United States Court of Federal Claims.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Nature of Suit: 494 Injury - Influenza
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

EDWARD RODIER, Petitioner, represented by Jeffrey S. Pop , Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent, represented by Jennifer Leigh Reynaud , U. S. Department of Justice.



NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.

On July 29, 2016, Edward Rodier ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleged that he sustained a shoulder injury from an influenza ("flu") vaccination he received on October 9, 2015. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit ("SPU") of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 9, 2017, the undersigned issued a ruling on entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA"). On January 6, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") in her Rule 4(c) Report indicating petitioner should be awarded $105,391.16. Rule 4(c) Rep. at 4. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the Proffer,3 the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $105,391.16 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Edward Rodier. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4



1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. The Proffer is not attached to this decision because it was included in the Rule 4(c) Report, which contains confidential medical information.
4. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.


1000 Characters Remaining reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases