RUHLMAN v. RUDOLFSKY

Case No. 2:14-cv-00879-RFB-NJK.

MAX RUHLMAN, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. GLENN RUDOLFSKY, et al., Defendant(s).

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric Sambold, Plaintiff, represented by Elizabeth J. Foley , Elizabeth Foley Lawyer Ltd.

Eric Sambold, Plaintiff, represented by Hannah C. Irsfeld , IRSFELD & ASSOCIATES, LLC..

James Ruhlmann, Plaintiff, represented by Elizabeth J. Foley , Elizabeth Foley Lawyer Ltd & Hannah C. Irsfeld , IRSFELD & ASSOCIATES, LLC..

Glenn Rudolfsky, Defendant, represented by Valerie Del Grosso .

House of Dreams Kauai, Inc., Defendant, represented by Valerie Del Grosso .


ORDER

NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.

On April 24, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel and for sanctions, including case-dispositive sanctions. Docket No. 182. On May 11, 2017, Defendants filed a defective response. First, the response is untimely. The Court denied the previous stipulation to extend, and a further request was not made. Instead, Defendants indicate in a footnote that "[a] motion will be filed promptly to extend." Id. at 1 n.1. The time for seeking an extension to a briefing deadline is before the brief is filed, not after. Second, the response lacks any citation to any legal authority, which the Court may construe in its discretion to be consent to the granting of the motion. See Local Rule 7-2(d). Given the important issues at stake, including possible case-dispositive sanctions, the Court will instead permit Defendants an opportunity to file a proper responsive brief.

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Defendants to file a proper response to Plaintiffs' motion by noon on Monday, May 15, 2017. Defendants must also file concurrently therewith a separate request to extend the response deadline nunc pro tunc explaining why the Court should consider the motion opposed given that Defendants did not file any response by May 8, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases