JOHNSON v. SCHWARZENEGGER

No. 2:15-cv-2269 MCE DB P.

OSHAY JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oshay Johnson, Plaintiff, Pro Se.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 28, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. After receiving an extension of time to file any objections, plaintiff informed the court of the following: (1) he moves to dismiss defendants Schwarzenegger and Cates, (2) he will file a separate action against defendants Brown, Fritz, Gardner, Shaffer, Artis, Rackley, and Beard, and (3) he wishes to proceed in this action against defendants Ledesia, Wong, Scavette, Sisto, Yates, and Shannon. (ECF No. 20.)

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. In addition, the court will grant plaintiff's request to dismiss defendants Schwarzenegger and Cate. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 28, 2017 (ECF No. 17) are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Brown, Fritz, Gardner, Shaffer, Artis, Rackley, and Beard are denied without prejudice; and

3. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 20) defendants Schwarzenegger and Cate is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases