Case No. 2:17-cv-00234-BRO-JEM.

JOHN DOE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. DAMIEN VAZQUEZ, an individual, and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Doe, Plaintiff, represented by Salar Atrizadeh , Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh.


BEVERLY R. O'CONNELL, District Judge.


It appears from the records in the above-entitled action that the Summons and Complaint have been served upon Defendant Damien Vazquez and it further appears from Plaintiff John Doe's Application for Default Judgment, declarations, and other evidence, as required by F.R.Civ.P. 55(a)-(b), that Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend in the above-captioned action as directed in the Summons and Complaint and as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It appears that Defendant is not a minor or incompetent person, is not currently serving in the military, is not an officer or an agency of the United States, and is not a foreign state or a political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality of a foreign state. It also appears that Plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain or a sum that can be made certain by computation.

The Court hereby enters default judgment in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant on the following causes of action: (1) Invasion of privacy; (2) Civil harassment in violation of California Code of Civil Procedure § 527.6; (3) Civil stalking in violation of California Code of Civil Procedure § 1708.7 et seq.; (4) Cyber exploitation in violation of California Code of Civil Procedure § 1708.85 et seq.; and (5) Intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. Furthermore, the Court awards to Plaintiff damages in the amount of $97,593.15, as well as attorney's fees in the amount of $5,503.73. The total amount of the judgment, which is $103,096.88, shall bear post-judgment interest at a rate calculated in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961.



1000 Characters Remaining reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases