U.S. v. COLQUITT

Case No. 3:09-cr-109.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PIERRE COLQUITT, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pierre O Colquitt, Petitioner, Pro Se.

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Brent Tabacchi , United States Attorney's Office & William Firman Schenck, Jr. , U.S. Attorney's Office.


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON SHOW CAUSE PROFFER (DOC. # 172); OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. # 176); FINDING THAT DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 11; PROHIBITING DEFENDANT FROM FILING FURTHER MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION IN THIS CASE; FINING DEFENDANT $1,000.00; SAID FINE TO BE SUSPENDED UNLESS DEFENDANT ATTEMPTS TO FILE AN ADDITIONAL MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz, in his Report and Recommendations on Show Cause Proffer, Doc. # 172, as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety.

Defendant's request for additional time to file Objections to that Report and Recommendations, Doc. # 173, was denied. Thereafter, Defendant did file Objections, Doc. # 176, which the Court now OVERRULES. Not only were they untimely but, in addition, Defendant simply rehashes the same arguments that the Court has rejected on numerous occasions.

Magistrate Judge Merz properly concluded that Defendant has failed to show cause why he should not be sanctioned under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c) for continuing to file frivolous motions for reconsideration. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED not to accept any additional motions for reconsideration from Defendant in the above-captioned case.

Defendant is FINED $1,000.00 for continuing to file frivolous motions for reconsideration. Said fine shall be SUSPENDED unless Defendant attempts to file another motion for reconsideration, at which time the Court will order said funds to be withdrawn from Defendant's commissary account.

Defendant's remedy, should he disagree with the Court's disposition of this matter, is to file a Notice of Appeal with the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, 200 West Second Street, Room 712, Dayton, Ohio 45402, within fourteen days of the date of this Decision and Entry.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases