HEBERT v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE

Civil Action No. 15-850-JWD-RLB.

MICHAEL HEBERT (#263630), v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL.

United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Hebert, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

City of Baton Rouge, Defendant, represented by Arthur H. Andrews & Michael Paul Schillage , Office of the East Baton Rouge Parish Attorney.

East Baton Rouge Parish, Defendant, represented by Arthur H. Andrews & Michael Paul Schillage , Office of the East Baton Rouge Parish Attorney.

Warden Dennis Grimes, Defendant, represented by Mary G. Erlingson , Erlingson Banks, PLLC, Catherine S. St. Pierre , Erlingson Banks, PLLC & Tara Lynn Johnston , Erlingson Banks, PLLC.

Sid Gautreaux, Defendant, represented by Mary G. Erlingson , Erlingson Banks, PLLC, Catherine S. St. Pierre , Erlingson Banks, PLLC & Tara Lynn Johnston , Erlingson Banks, PLLC.

LCS Corporation, Defendant, represented by Marie Candice Hattan , M. Candice Hattan, APLC.

Charles Bridges, Individually, Defendant, represented by John Swanner , Seale, Smith, Zuber & Barnette.

Rani Whitfield, Individually, Defendant, represented by Vance A. Gibbs , Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D'Armond, Deborah Johnson Juneau , Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D'Armond, Jason R. Cashio , Kean Miller LLP & Randal R. Cangelosi , Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D'Armond.


OPINION

JOHN W. DEGRAVELLES, District Judge.

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated March 29, 2017, to which an objection was filed:

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss (R. Doc. 64) is granted in part, and the plaintiff's medical malpractice claims against defendant Dr. Whitfield are dismissed, without prejudice. In all other regards, the defendant's Motion (R. Doc. 64) is denied.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases