OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES H. PAYNE, District Judge.
Petitioner, a pro se pretrial detainee in the Muskogee County Jail, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Dkt. 1). On May 1, 2017, the Court entered an Order granting her motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 5) and directing her to file an amended complaint (Dkt. 4). On May 8, 2017, however, the two Orders were returned to the Court, marked "Return to Sender, Attempted Not Known, Unable to Forward" (Dkt. 6). Petitioner has not advised the Court of her current address, as required by the Court's local rule:
Local Civil Rule 5.6(a).
Because Petitioner has failed to comply with Local Civil Rule 5.6(a), this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See United States ex rel. Geminis v. Health Net, Inc., 400 F.3d 853, 854-56 (10th Cir. 2005) (dismissing appeal sua sponte for failure to prosecute because appellant disappeared and failed to meet court deadlines).