KIMBERLY A. JOLSON, Magistrate Judge.
Consistent with this Court May 10, 2017 Order, Plaintiffs have submitted the documents relevant to their Motion for Leave to Seal for in camera inspection. The Court has reviewed those documents bearing in mind that Plaintiffs are seeking to seal them consistent with Section 15 of the Amended and Restated Stacktrain Services Agreement. (Doc. 5 at 3). As this Court has observed, however, "[t]he public has a strong interest in obtaining the information contained in the court record." Shane Grp., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., ___ F.3d ___, No. 15-1544, 2016 WL 3163073, at *3 (6th Cir. June 7, 2016) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983)). Balancing the parties' agreement against the "`strong presumption in favor of openness' as to court records" id. (quoting Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1179), the Court finds that a temporary seal is appropriate.
Here, Plaintiffs filed a redacted version of its Motion to Compel Arbitration prior to being granted permission to do so by this Court. (See Doc. 3). Although the Court does not look favorably on that decision, the Court will allow the redacted document to stand in light of this decision to allow a temporary seal. However, Plaintiffs' exhibits have not been filed publicly on the Court's docket. Hence, Plaintiffs are
IT IS SO ORDERED.