GONZALEZ v. ARROYO

No. C16-1844-JLR-JPD.

ELIADES ROSALES GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. ARROYO, Respondent.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nature of Suit: 463 Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eliades Rosales Gonzalez, Petitioner, Pro Se.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JAMES P. DONOHUE, Chief Magistrate Judge.

Proceeding pro se, petitioner has filed a proposed habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. By letter dated December 12, 2016, petitioner was granted 30 days to either pay the filing fee or submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"), along with a certified copy of his prison trust account statement showing transactions for the past six months. Dkt. 4. Petitioner was advised that failure to respond to the letter by January 11, 2017, could result in dismissal of the case. Id. On January 17, 2017, the Court granted petitioner an extension of time until February 17, 2017, to correct the IFP deficiency. Dkt. 5.

To date, petitioner has neither paid the filing fee nor corrected the IFP deficiency. Accordingly, the Court recommends this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914. A proposed order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.

Objections to this Report and Recommendation, if any, should be filed with the Clerk and served upon all parties to this suit by no later than April 25, 2017. Failure to file objections within the specified time may affect your right to appeal. Objections should be noted for consideration on the District Judge's motion calendar for the third Friday after they are filed. Responses to objections may be filed within fourteen (14) days after service of objections. If no timely objections are filed, the matter will be ready for consideration by the District Judge on April 28, 2017.

This Report and Recommendation is not an appealable order. Thus, a notice of appeal seeking review in the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit should not be filed until the assigned District Judge acts on this Report and Recommendation.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases