BARNES v. DANZINGER & DE LLANO, LLP

Civil Action No. 4:16CV072-SA-JMV.

BOBBY BARNES, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. DANZINGER & DE LLANO, LLP, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division.

April 21, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Personal Injury
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bobby Barnes, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice.

Bobby Barnes, Plaintiff, represented by Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Charles E. Blanks, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Vernell Burks, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Shirley Campbell Skinner, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Estate of Edwin Eugene Campbell, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

James Lavon Lucas, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Theoplis Nelson, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

William Pittman, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Donald Quitman Powell, Sr., Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Andrew Rodgers, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Myrtis Opal Roland, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Estate of Dan Roland, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Lee Roy Sanders, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Guy Marcus Shiflett, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Larry Donell Showers, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

L. C. Smith, Jr., Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Johnny W. Thomas, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Robert Weeks, Jr., Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Ernest Wiley, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Pam Yarbrough-Hampton, Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Pusch , JERRY PUSCH, ATTORNEY AT LAW, pro hac vice & Nancy Powers Johnson , NANCY POWERS JOHNSON, ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Danziger & De Llano, LLP, Defendant, represented by Millard A. Johnson , JOHNSON DELUCA KURISKY & GOULD, PC, pro hac vice & Walter Alan Davis , DUNBAR DAVIS, PLLC.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION BY REASON OF SETTLEMENT

The Court has been advised that this action has been settled, or is in the process of being settled. Therefore, it is not necessary that the action remain upon the calendar of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases