FULFORD v. GRIFFITH

Case No. 16-cv-00770-MEJ.

FRED FULFORD, Plaintiff, v. DON M. GRIFFITH, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 555 Prisoner: Prison Condition
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Fulford, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Don M. Griffith, Defendant, represented by Kevin Peter Kelly , Goldman Law Firm.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 24

MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff, a California prisoner currently incarcerated at California Medical Facility, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Dr. Griffith was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff's request for entry of default judgment in his favor. Dkt. No. 24. Plaintiff argues that he is entitled to default judgment because Dr. Griffith has failed to file a dispositive motion by the deadline set forth in the Court's December 29, 2016 Order Denying Motion to Dismiss, Denying Motion to Strike and Setting Briefing Schedule. Plaintiff's motion is DENIED. Defendant timely filed a dispositive motion on March 30, 2017. Dkt. No. 23.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases