Case No. C17-0087JLR.

ANTHONY D. HILL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DES MOINES, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 443 Civil Rights: Accommodations
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony D. Hill, Plaintiff, Pro Se.


JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.

On March 23, 2017, the court dismissed pro se Plaintiff Anthony D. Hill's first amended complaint without prejudice and granted him until April 12, 2017, to amend his complaint. (3/23/17 Order (Dkt. # 26).) The court found that Mr. Hill's factual allegations failed to state a claim for violation of his constitutional rights. (Id. at 6-8 (concluding that even after liberally construing Mr. Hill's amended complaint, Mr. Hill failed to state a claim for false arrest or deliberate indifference).) Despite these deficiencies and in light of Mr. Hill's pro se status, the court granted Mr. Hill until April 12, 2017, to amend his complaint. (Id. at 10.) The court cautioned Mr. Hill that his failure to timely amend the complaint or remedy the deficiencies identified in the court's order would result in dismissal without leave to amend. (Id. at 9.)

Mr. Hill's deadline to file a second amended complaint passed on April 12, 2017, and he has filed nothing further in this matter. (See Dkt.) Accordingly, the court DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE.


1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases