JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
On March 23, 2017, the court dismissed pro se Plaintiff Anthony D. Hill's first amended complaint without prejudice and granted him until April 12, 2017, to amend his complaint. (3/23/17 Order (Dkt. # 26).) The court found that Mr. Hill's factual allegations failed to state a claim for violation of his constitutional rights. (Id. at 6-8 (concluding that even after liberally construing Mr. Hill's amended complaint, Mr. Hill failed to state a claim for false arrest or deliberate indifference).) Despite these deficiencies and in light of Mr. Hill's pro se status, the court granted Mr. Hill until April 12, 2017, to amend his complaint. (Id. at 10.) The court cautioned Mr. Hill that his failure to timely amend the complaint or remedy the deficiencies identified in the court's order would result in dismissal without leave to amend. (Id. at 9.)
Mr. Hill's deadline to file a second amended complaint passed on April 12, 2017, and he has filed nothing further in this matter. (See Dkt.) Accordingly, the court DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE.