1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MICROSOFT MOBILE, INC. v. InterDIGITAL, INC.
 

MICROSOFT MOBILE, INC. v. InterDIGITAL, INC.

Civil Action No. 15-723-RGA.

MICROSOFT MOBILE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. INTERDIGITAL, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

March 21, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Nature of Suit: 410 Anti - Trust
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Microsoft Mobile, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Francis DiGiovanni , Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

Microsoft Mobile, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by David Giardina , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice, David T. Pritikin , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice, Paul H. Saint-Antoine , Drinker Biddle, pro hac vice, Richard A. Cederoth , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice, Stacy Quan , pro hac vice & Thatcher A. Rahmeier , Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

Microsoft Mobile Oy, Plaintiff, represented by Francis DiGiovanni , Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP & Thatcher A. Rahmeier , Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

InterDigital, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP, Jonathan M. Jacobson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, pro hac vice, Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP, David S. Steuer , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, pro hac vice, Lucy Yen , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, pro hac vice, Maura L. Rees , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, pro hac vice & Michael B. Levin , pro hac vice.

InterDigital Communications Inc., Defendant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP & Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP.

InterDigital Technology Corporation, Defendant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP & Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP.

InterDigital Patent Holdings Inc., Defendant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP & Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP.

InterDigital Holdings Inc., Defendant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP & Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP.

IPR Licensing Inc., Defendant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP & Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP.

InterDigital Holdings Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP & Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP.

InterDigital, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP, Jonathan M. Jacobson , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP, David S. Steuer , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Lucy Yen , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Maura L. Rees , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati & Michael B. Levin .

InterDigital Technology Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP & Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP.

IPR Licensing Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP & Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP.

InterDigital Communications Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP & Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP.

InterDigital Patent Holdings Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP & Neal C. Belgam , Smith, Katzenstein, & Jenkins LLP.

Microsoft Mobile Oy, Counter Defendant, represented by Francis DiGiovanni , Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP & Thatcher A. Rahmeier , Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

Microsoft Mobile, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Francis DiGiovanni , Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, David Giardina , Sidley Austin LLP, David T. Pritikin , Sidley Austin LLP, Paul H. Saint-Antoine , Drinker Biddle, Richard A. Cederoth , Sidley Austin LLP, Stacy Quan & Thatcher A. Rahmeier , Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Defendants seek to conduct discovery from Nokia Corporation using the Hague Convention. (D.1. 62). Plaintiffs agree that such discovery is appropriate, but dispute the scope of the requests. (D.I. 66). Defendants seek a corporate designee deposition and eleven depositions of named individuals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases