SEMCON IP INC. v. HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC.

Case Nos. 2:16-cv-437-JRG-RSP (Lead), 2:16-cv-438-JRG-RSP, 2:16-cv-439-JRG-RSP, 2:16-cv-440-JRG-RSP

SEMCON IP INC., v. HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., et al., MEDIATEK INC., MEDIATEK USA INC. STMICROELECTRONICS INC., STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Semcon IP Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Alfred Ross Fabricant , Brown Rudnick, LLP.

Semcon IP Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Lawrence Chester Drucker , Brown Rudnick, LLP, Alessandra Carcaterra Messing , Brown Rudnick, LLP, John Andrew Rubino , Brown Rudnick, LLP, Justin Kurt Truelove , Truelove Law Firm, Peter Lambrianakos , Brown Rudnick, LLP, Shahar Harel , Brown Rudnick, LLP & Vincent J. Rubino, III , Brown Rudnick, LLP.

Huawei Device USA Inc., Defendant, represented by Melissa Richards Smith , Gillam & Smith, LLP, Peter James Wied , LTL Attorneys LLP & Vincent K. Yip , LTL Attorneys LLP.

Huawei Technologies USA Inc., Defendant, represented by Melissa Richards Smith , Gillam & Smith, LLP, Peter James Wied , LTL Attorneys LLP & Vincent K. Yip , LTL Attorneys LLP.

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Defendant, represented by Melissa Richards Smith , Gillam & Smith, LLP, Peter James Wied , LTL Attorneys LLP & Vincent K. Yip , LTL Attorneys LLP.

MediaTek Inc., Consol Defendant, represented by Heather Fai Auyang , LTL Attorneys LLP, Lauren Sliger , LTL Attorneys LLP, Melissa Richards Smith , Gillam & Smith, LLP & Michael J. Song , LTL Attorneys LLP.

MediaTek USA Inc., Consol Defendant, represented by Heather Fai Auyang , LTL Attorneys LLP, Lauren Sliger , LTL Attorneys LLP, Melissa Richards Smith , Gillam & Smith, LLP & Michael J. Song , LTL Attorneys LLP.

STMicroelectronics Inc, Consol Defendant, represented by Thomas N. Tarnay , Sidley Austin LLP, Gregory Blake Thompson , Mann Tindel & Thompson, James Mark Mann , Mann Tindel & Thompson, Kelley Anne Conaty , Sidley Austin LLP, Robert Seth Reich, Jr. , Sidley Austin LLP & Tung Thanh Nguyen , Sidley Austin LLP.

Texas Instruments Incorporated, Consol Defendant, represented by Andrea Leigh Fair , Ward, Smith & Hill, PLLC, Jack Wesley Hill , Ward, Smith & Hill, PLLC, Thomas M. Melsheimer , Winston & Strawn, LLP, Amanda Aline Abraham , The Roth Law Firm, Jackob Ben-Ezra , Fish & Richardson PC, James Eugene Youngblood , Fish & Richardson P.C., Lawrence Rodell Jarvis , Fish & Richardson PC & Thomas Howard Reger, II , Fish & Richardson P.C..

ZTE (USA), Inc., Consol Defendant, represented by Steven Arthur Moore , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Callie McCarthy Bjurstrom , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP & Matthew Robert Stephens , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.

ZTE (TX), Inc., Consol Defendant, represented by Steven Arthur Moore , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Callie McCarthy Bjurstrom , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP & Matthew Robert Stephens , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.

ZTE (USA), Inc., Consol Counter Claimant, represented by Alfred Ross Fabricant , Brown Rudnick, LLP, Steven Arthur Moore , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Callie McCarthy Bjurstrom , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP & Matthew Robert Stephens , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on February 21, 2017 (Dkt. No. 73) recommending denial of Dkt. No. 20 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00437 (Huawei's motion); Dkt. No. 22 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00439 (STMicroelectronics's motion); Dkt. No. 19 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00438 (MediaTek's motion); and Dkt. No. 17 in Case No. 2:16-00440 (Texas Instruments' motion) (collectively, "the Motions"). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Motions, and the subsequent Objections filed by Defendants (Dkt. Nos. 78, 79). The Court finds the Objections to be without suf ficient merit. The Recommendation is adopted.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED.

So ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases