ESTATE OF BURGARD EX REL. HORAN v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

Case No. 2:15-cv-00833-RFB-GWF.

The Estate of MARILYN BURGARD, Deceased, by and through KEVIN HORAN its Special Administrator, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign Corporation; AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign Corporation; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 110 Insurance
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Estate of Marilyn Burgard, Plaintiff, represented by Jerome R. Bowen , Bowen Law Offices.

The Estate of Marilyn Burgard, Plaintiff, represented by Sarah M. Banda , Bowen Law Offices.

Kevin Horan, Plaintiff, represented by Jerome R. Bowen , Bowen Law Offices & Sarah M. Banda , Bowen Law Offices.

Bank of America, N.A., Defendant, represented by Robert S. Larsen , Gordon & Rees LLP.

Aetna Life Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Sarah N. Turner , Gordon & Rees LLP & Robert S. Larsen , Gordon & Rees LLP.


PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.

COMES NOW Plaintiff, The Estate of MARILYN BURGARD, Deceased, by and through KEVIN HORAN its Special Administrator, hereby file this Motion to Extend Time to File Supplemental Brief pursuant to LR6-1.

Pursuant to the above-stated Rule, the Plaintiff requests that they be given an additional one week extension of time to file their supplemental brief per the Court's Minute Order (ECF 81). This request encompasses, that if granted, Defendants receive the benefit of the extension as the Court ordered simultaneous briefing.

Plaintiff attempted to obtain an agreement to extend the supplemental brief deadline from Defendants, but was unsuccessful. However, Defendants' Counsel has informed our office that they would not be opposing this Motion for additional time. See Declaration of Jerome R. Bowen, Esq.

Therefore, Plaintiff requests a one week extension of time up to, and including March 21, 2017, for the Parties to file the simultaneous supplemental briefing ordered by the court (ECF 81). This is the first extension of time regarding this briefing. Thus, this Motion is necessitated in the interests of justice. Plaintiff brings this motion in good faith without intending to hinder or delay the prompt adjudication of this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DECLARATION OF JEROME R. BOWEN, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

I, JEROME R. BOWEN, ESQ., declare as follows:

1. I am owner/principal at Bowen Law Offices, and am duly licensed to practice law in the State of Nevada. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years. I am the lead attorney at Bowen Law Offices who represent Plaintiff in the above-entitled action. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein and I am competent to testify to the same.

2. I have had a death in my family this last weekend out of state, which requires me to be out of the office. Thus, Plaintiff will require additional time to complete, finalize and file the supplemental brief due March 14, 2017. ECF No. 81.

3. Thus, I had requested my office contact Defendants' counsel to obtain an agreement to extend the supplemental brief deadline for one week, but Defendants' counsel would not be able to secure his clients' agreement in time. However, Defendants' counsel has informed our office that they would not be opposing this Motion for additional time.

4. Plaintiff requests a one week extension of time up to, and including, March 21, 2017, for the Parties to file the simultaneous supplemental briefing ordered by the court (ECF No. 81). This is the first extension of time regarding this briefing. This motion is brought in good faith without intending to hinder or delay the prompt adjudication of this matter.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

JEROME R. BOWEN, ESQ.

No notarization required pursuant to NRS 53.045


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases