BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. SUNRISE RIDGE MASTER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION

Case No. 2:17-cv-00233.

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWALT, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-57CB, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-57CB, Plaintiff, v. SUNRISE RIDGE MASTER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC; NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.; DOE INDIVIDUALS I-X, inclusive, and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Petition to Quiet Title
Nature of Suit: 220 Real Property: Foreclosure
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bank Of New York Mellon, Plaintiff, represented by Darren T. Brenner , Akerman LLP.

Bank Of New York Mellon, Plaintiff, represented by Natalie L. Winslow , Akerman LLP.

Sunrise Ridge Master Homeowners Association, Defendant, represented by Eric Tran , Lipson Neilson Cole Seltzer & Garin.

SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, Defendant, represented by Diana Cline Ebron , Kim Gilbert Ebron.

SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, Cross Claimant, represented by Diana Cline Ebron , Kim Gilbert Ebron.

SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Diana Cline Ebron , Kim Gilbert Ebron.

Bank Of New York Mellon, Counter Defendant, represented by Darren T. Brenner , Akerman LLP & Natalie L. Winslow , Akerman LLP.


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON'S COMPLAINT

(First Request)

CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.

Defendant SUNRISE RIDGE MASTER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ("HOA") and Plaintiff BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWALT, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-57CB, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-57CB ("BNYM"), by and through their respective counsel hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED, that the deadline for Defendant HOA to Respond to Plaintiff BNYM's Complaint shall be extended to March 16, 2017. The HOA's Response was originally due on February 20, 2017. As counsel for Defendant HOA has just been retained in this matter, the parties have entered into this agreement in good faith and not for purposes of delay. This is the parties' way of accommodating each other given the circumstances.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases