PHIGENIX, INC. v. GENENTECH INC.

Case No. 15-cv-01238-BLF.

238 F.Supp.3d 1177 (2017)

PHIGENIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. GENENTECH INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, SAN JOSE DIVISION.

Signed February 24, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory L. Porter , Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP, Houston, GA, John Murray , Robert Alan Gutkin , Michael Ye , Andrews Kurth, Kenyon LLP, Washington, DC, Paul E. Weathington , Atlanta, GA, Edward Vincent King, Jr. , King & Kelleher LLP, San Francisco, CA, Paul D. Ackerman , Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.

Matthew I. Kreeger , Morrison & Foerster, Michael A. Jacobs , Christopher Jamieson Kendall , Christopher James Wiener , George C. Harris , Matthew Alan Chivvis , Matthew Ian Kreeger , Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, Catherine Mary Polizzi , Morrison and Foerster LLP, Palo Alto, CA, James J. Cekola , Morrison Foerster LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[Re: ECF 257]

Plaintiff Phigenix, Inc. ("Phigenix") alleges that Defendant Genentech, Inc. ("Genentech") infringes certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,080,534 ("the '534 patent") based on Kadcyla, a drug targeting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases