1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PREFERRED CARE, INC. v. BARNETT
 

PREFERRED CARE, INC. v. BARNETT

Civil Action No. 5:16-372-KKC.

PREFERRED CARE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. JUDY BARNETT, as administrator of Donald Shelton's estate, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Central Division, Lexington.

February 16, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Cause: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Nature of Suit: 896 Other Statutes: Arbitration
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Preferred Care, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by David Phillip Kaiser , Quintaros, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A..

Preferred Care, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Donald L. Miller, II , Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. & J. Peter Cassidy, III , Quintaros, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A..

Kentucky Partners Management, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by David Phillip Kaiser , Quintaros, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Donald L. Miller, II , Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. & J. Peter Cassidy, III , Quintaros, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A..

Preferred Care Partners Management Group, LP, Plaintiff, represented by David Phillip Kaiser , Quintaros, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Donald L. Miller, II , Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. & J. Peter Cassidy, III , Quintaros, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A..

Stanton Health Facilities, LP, Plaintiff, represented by David Phillip Kaiser , Quintaros, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Donald L. Miller, II , Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. & J. Peter Cassidy, III , Quintaros, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A..

Judy Barnett, Defendant, represented by Don A. Pisacano , Miller, Griffin & Marks, P.S.C., Elizabeth Catesby Woodford , Miller, Griffin & Marks, P.S.C., Elliott Clay Miller , Miller, Griffin & Marks, P.S.C., Thomas Walcutt Miller , Miller, Griffin & Marks, P.S.C. & William Todd Forester , Miller, Griffin & Marks, P.S.C..

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs' motion to compel arbitration (DE 9) and the defendant's motion to dismiss (DE 6). For the following reasons, the Court will grant the motion to dismiss and deny the motion to compel.

I. Background

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases