FLACK v. KNOX COUNTY

No. 3:15-cv-00522.

LOUIS FLACK, Plaintiff, v. KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Knoxville.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis W Flack, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas C. Jessee , Jessee & Jessee.

Louis W Flack, Plaintiff, represented by Lance Kristopher Baker , The Baker Law Firm.

Knox County, Tennessee, Defendant, represented by David S. Wigler , Knox County Law Director's Office.

Nicholas J Breeden, Defendant, represented by Joshua D. Hedrick , Whitt, Cooper, Trant & Hedrick.

David C Sparkes, Defendant, represented by John E. Owings , Robertson, Overbey & Shelly L. Wilson , Robertson, Overbey.

Jesse R Rudd, Defendant, represented by John E. Owings , Robertson, Overbey & Shelly L. Wilson , Robertson, Overbey.

Christopher S Fustos, Defendant, represented by John E. Owings , Robertson, Overbey & Shelly L. Wilson , Robertson, Overbey.

Randall R Kidd, Defendant, represented by John E. Owings , Robertson, Overbey & Shelly L. Wilson , Robertson, Overbey.

Spencer Solomon, Defendant, represented by David S. Wigler , Knox County Law Director's Office.

Boyd Flack, Interested Party, represented by Ursula Bailey , Law Office of Ursula Bailey.


ORDER

PAMELA L. REEVES, District Judge.

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Guyton's report and recommendation. [D. 68]. The R&R recommends that Louis Flack's motion for attorneys' fees be granted in part and denied in part, and that Flack be awarded $69,301.25 in attorneys' fees plus post-judgment interest. There have been no objections to the R&R, and Knox County has asked the Court to adopt it. [D. 69]. After a careful review of the record, the Court agrees with the R&R and ADOPTS it. Flack's motion for attorneys' fees [D. 49] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Flack is AWARDED $69,301.25 in attorneys' fees plus post-judgment interest.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases