AMENDED MOTION TO CORRECT SENTENCE; ORDER
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Darryl Parker hereby requests that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35, the Court correct the sentence imposed on February 1, 2017, which exceeded the maximum fine allowable under 38 C.F.R. § 1.218(b). The government does not oppose this request.
Mr. Parker was issued a citation
Following Mr. Parker's plea and sentence, the parties conferred regarding a discrepancy between the maximum fine set forth in 38 C.F.R. § 1.218(b) and that which was imposed under the general fine provision of 18 U.S.C. § 3571(b)(6). The parties believe that Code of Federal Regulations set the controlling fine amount, as opposed to Title 18. 38 C.F.R. § 1.218(b)(29) sets the maximum fine for a violation of that section at $15.00, plus any processing fee and/or special assessment imposed by the court. Based upon this reading of the regulation, it appears that Mr. Parker was sentenced in error to a fine that exceeds the maximum by $60.00.
Mr. Parker was erroneously sentenced to a fine that exceeded the maximum prescribed in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is the controlling statute for penalties for violations of Title 38 of that Code.
38 U.S.C. § 901 authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs to prescribe regulations to provide for the maintenance of law and order and the protection of personals and property on VA property. 38 U.S.C. § 901(a). Those regulations include rules for conduct on VA property as well as the "penalties for violation of such rules."
The VA Regulations themselves set forth a "Schedule of Offenses and Penalties." 38 C.F.R. § 1.218(b). That provision states that "whomever shall be found guilty of violating these rules and regulations while on any property under the charge and control of VA is subject to a fine as stated in the schedule set forth herein..."
The Court is permitted to correct a sentence that resulted from "arithmetical, technical, or other clear error" within 14 days after the sentence was imposed. Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). Here, Mr. Parker was cited for a violation of 38 C.F.R. § 1.218(b)(29), which has a specific maximum fine prescribed by the regulation. The maximum fine under the regulation is $15.00. Mr. Parker was sentenced to pay a total fine of $75.00 (apart from processing fees and special assessments). His fine therefore exceeded the maximum by $60.00, which is a technical error in his sentence. It is Mr. Parker's request that his sentence be corrected to reflect a fine of $15.00, in addition to the appropriate processing fee and special assessment, pursuant to Rule 35.
Defendant's unopposed request is GRANTED. The Court hereby corrects the fine amount to $15.00, for a total monetary penalty of $55.00 inclusive of the $30.00 processing fee and $10.00 special assessment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.