DANKO v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION

Civil Action No. 16-1235.

PAULINE DANKO and MARK DANKO, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

PAULINE DANKO, Plaintiff, represented by MICHAEL J. QUIRK , WILLIAMS CUKER BEREZOFSKY.

MARK DANKO, Plaintiff, represented by MICHAEL J. QUIRK , WILLIAMS CUKER BEREZOFSKY.

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Defendant, represented by SARAH BRYAN FASK , LITTLER MENDELSON.


ORDER

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 10th day of February 2017, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 8] and the response and reply thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall file its answer to the Complaint within 14 days of the date of this Order.

It is so ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases