LOVE v. BART COOPER BAIL BONDS

No. 4:17-CV-583 JMB.

ANDREA LOVE, Plaintiff, v. BART COOPER BAIL BONDS, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Other Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrea Love, Plaintiff, Pro Se.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JEAN C. HAMILTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Andrea Love, has filed a civil suit and seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. After reviewing the financial information provided with the complaint, plaintiff will be granted leave to proceed without payment of the filing fee. Additionally, the Court will direct plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

Plaintiff, who is a citizen of Florida, alleges that Bart Cooper Bail Bonds, a bond company located in Kansas City, Missouri1, entered into an agreement with her in May of 2015. Plaintiff states that she provided Bart Cooper Bail Bonds with $4,160.00 by credit card in order to "post bail" for her son, Christopher, who had been taken into custody in Grandview, Missouri.2 Plaintiff alleges that despite having given the amount necessary to Bart Cooper Bail Bonds, her son was not released on bail, and her money was not returned (minus the court fees and the bond processing fees). Plaintiff states that she attempted to elicit the return of the fees on her own, in the amount of a $2,340 refund, but no money was returned to her.

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. The Court has jurisdiction to hear cases involving the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and the Court can hear cases where diversity jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. In order for diversity jurisdiction to exist, a plaintiff must allege in her complaint that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 and the matter is between citizens of different states.

The instant action does not arise under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States, so federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 is inapplicable. Therefore, the Court may only hear this case if diversity jurisdiction exists.

It does not appear that diversity jurisdiction exists because the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000. Plaintiff states that she wishes a refund a mere $2,340, which is a far cry from the $75,000 necessary to maintain this action in federal court.

As a result, the Court will order plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed.R.Civ.P.12(h)(3).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must show cause no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order why this action should not be dismissed.

FootNotes


1. Bart Cooper Bail Bonds is an active Missouri Corporation, 100% owned by Bart Cooper, registered to do business in Missouri. Bart Cooper is a citizen of Lee Summit, Missouri.
2. Grandview, Missouri is located in Jackson, County, Missouri.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases