U.S. v. OWENS

Case No. 2:15CR00005.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. HAROLD OWENS, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Big Stone Gap Division.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Zachary T. Lee , United States Attorneys Office.


OPINION

JAMES P. JONES, District Judge.

The defendant, Harold Owens, who wassentenced by this courton March 31, 2016, has submitted a letter that I have construed as a Motion to Reopen the Time to Appeal. Upon review of the record, I find that the motion must be denied.

Owens claims that he told his attorney after sentencing to file a notice of appeal. Now that he has concluded correctly that no notice of appeal was filed, he wishes to appeal.

Owens' arguments have no merit. Rule 4(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure mandates that a notice of appeal from a federal criminal judgment must be filed within fourteen days from entry of the judgment. Subsection 4(b)(4) authorizes the district court, "[u]pon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause, . . . (to) extend the time to file a notice of appeal for a period not to exceed 30 days from the expiration of the time otherwise prescribed by this Rule 4(b)." Unlike Rule 4(a), which governs only appeals from civil judgments, Rule 4(b) does not include a provision allowing the court to reopen the time for filling a notice of appeal from a criminal judgment. The time periods presented in Rule 4(b) are mandatory and jurisdictional. United States v. Raynor, 939 F.2d 191, 196 (4th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Alvarez, No. 07-4165, 2007 NUL 2320063 (4th Cir. Aug. 15, 2007) (unpublished) (finding that district court erred in granting defendant an extension to file notice of appeal exceeding time periods in Rule 4(b), based on allegations that defendant thought counsel had filed a notice of appeal). Thus, under the rules governing this criminal case, I cannot grant Owens a renewed opportunity to file a notice of appeal.

For the stated reasons, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Reopen the Time to Appeal is hereby DENIED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases