JUGOZ v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

Case Nos. 16-cv-05687-MMC, 16-cv-05693-MMC, 16-cv-06347-MMC, 16-cv-06338-MMC

RUDOLPH JUGOZ, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. TERESA ROBLES, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et. al., Defendants. JANET PERKINS, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. WILHELMINE MADEIROS, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nature of Suit: 480 Consumer Credit
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilhelmine Medeiros, Plaintiff, represented by Elliot Wayne Gale , Sagaria Law, P.C..

Wilhelmine Medeiros, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph Brian Angelo , Sagaria Law, P.C., Scott Matthew Johnson , Sagaria Law, PC & Scott Joseph Sagaria , Sagaria Law, P.C..

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benjamin Chung Lee , Jones Day & Alexandra Alford McDonald , Jones Day.

Equifax, Inc., Defendant, represented by Thomas P. Quinn , Nokes & Quinn.

Bank of America, National Association, Defendant, represented by Raymond William Berry , McGuireWoods LLP & Anthony Q. Le , McGuireWoods LLP.

EnerBank USA, Defendant, represented by Pamela Lorraine Cox , Hemar, Rousso & Heald, LLP..


ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. AND EQUIFAX, INC.'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE; VACATING HEARING

Re: Dkt. No. 35

Re: Dkt. No. 36

Re: Dkt. No. 20

Re: Dkt. No. 26

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.

Before the Court is the "Motion to Consolidate," filed December 22, 2016, in each of the above-titled four cases, by defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ("Experian") and Equifax, Inc. ("Equifax"), by which filing said defendants seek to consolidate more than 170 lawsuits filed by plaintiffs' counsel and presently assigned to eighteen different judges in this district. Each of the four plaintiffs, as well as Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., one of the named defendants, have responded, to which Experian and Equifax have jointly filed a reply. The Court deems the matter suitable for determination on the parties' respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for February 17, 2017, and hereby rules as follows.

Pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a district court may consolidate actions that "involve a common question of law or fact," see Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), and has "broad discretion" to decide whether consolidation is appropriate, see Investors Research Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court for Central Dist. of California, 877 F.2d 777 (1989).

This Court, having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, is in accord with a number of judges in this district who have denied similar motions. See, e.g., Vizcaino v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-5703-TEH (N.D. Cal. January 31, 2017); Gonzalez v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-5678-HSG (N.D. Cal. January 4, 2017). In particular, although each of the actions asserts claims based on alleged violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Court finds any potential efficiency attributable to having such actions heard by a single judge would be outweighed by the various procedural delays resulting from the reassignment of a large number of cases pending at varying stages of the proceedings, coupled with the considerable burden placed on such jurist in adjudicating not only any common issue raised therein but all individual issues as well.

Accordingly, the motion to consolidate is, in each of the above-titled cases, hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases