WRIGHT v. TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Case No. 1:16-cv-01214-LJO-JLT.

BUDDY WRIGHT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Cause: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Nature of Suit: 448 Civil Rights: Education
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Buddy Wright, Plaintiff, represented by Andrea Moore Marcus , Law Offices of Andrea Marcus.

Amy Wright, Plaintiff, represented by Kelly Donald Kaeser , Law Offices of Andrea Marcus & Andrea Moore Marcus , Law Offices of Andrea Marcus.

Tehachapi Unified School District, Defendant, represented by Kyle W. Holmes , Schools Legal Service & Darren J. Bogie , Schools Legal Service.


ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.

This case is set for a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on February 24, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. at the U. S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721.

Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires thorough preparation prior to the settlement conference. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer

A settlement conference is more likely to be productive if, before the conference, the parties exchange written settlement proposals. Accordingly, by no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) on February 14, 2017, plaintiffs' counsel shall submit a written itemization of damages and settlement demand to each defense counsel with a brief summary of the legal and factual basis supporting the demand. No later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) on February 16, 2017, defense counsel shall submit a written offer to plaintiffs' counsel with a brief summary of the legal and factual basis supporting the offer.

2. Submission and Content of Confidential Settlement Conference Statements

The parties are to send Confidential Settlement Conference Statements (Settlement Statement) to the following email address: SKOorders@caed.uscourts.gov, to arrive no later than February 17, 2017. Additionally, each party shall file a Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement (See L.R. 270 (d)).

If the Settlement Conference is continued for any reason, each party must submit a new Settlement Statement that is complete in itself, without reference to any prior Settlement Statements.

Settlement Statements must be typed and double spaced. Each Settlement Statement shall include the following:

a. A brief summary of the core facts, allegations, and defenses. b. A summary of the proceedings to date. c. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and trial. d. The nature of the relief sought. e. An outline of past settlement efforts including information regarding the "Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer" required above (including the itemization of damages), and a history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands. f. A statement of each party's expectations and goals for the Settlement Conference.

3. Attendance of Trial Counsel and Parties Required

The attorneys who will try the case and parties with full and complete settlement authority are required to personally attend the conference.1 An insured party shall appear by a representative of the insurer who is authorized to negotiate, and who has authority to settle the matter up to the limits of the opposing parties' existing settlement demand. An uninsured corporate party shall appear by a representative authorized to negotiate, and who has authority to settle the matter up to the amount of the opposing parties' existing settlement demand or offer. It is difficult for a party who is not present to appreciate the process and the reasons that may justify a change in one's perspective toward settlement. Accordingly, having a client with authority available by telephone is not an acceptable alternative, except under the most extenuating circumstances.2

The Court expects both the lawyers and the party representatives to be fully prepared to participate. The Court encourages all parties to keep an open mind in order to reassess their previous positions and to discover creative means for resolving the dispute.

4. Issues to Be Discussed

The parties shall be prepared to discuss the following at the settlement conference:

a. Goals in the litigation and problems they would like to address in the settlement conference and understanding of the opposing side's goals. b. The issues (in and outside the lawsuit) that need to be resolved. c. The strengths and weaknesses of their case. d. Their understanding of the opposing side's view of the case. e. Their points of agreement and disagreement (factual and legal). f. Any financial, emotional, and/or legal impediments to settlement. g. Whether settlement or further litigation better enables the accomplishment of their respective goals. h. Any possibilities for a creative resolution of the dispute.

5. Statements Inadmissible

The parties are expected to address each other with courtesy and respect, and are encouraged to be frank and open in their discussions. Statements made by any party during the settlement conference are not to be used in discovery and will not be admissible at trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible, the representative shall have the authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent demand.
2. Out of town or out of state travel and the purchase of an airplane ticket are not extenuating circumstances.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases