J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff has brought this pro se action under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. Plaintiff has responded to the motion. The motion will be granted.
Plaintiff concedes that she did not file this action within 90 days of receipt of the Final Agency Decision terminating her employment. Plaintiff picked up the FAD on March 24, 2016, and this action was not filed until, at the earliest, June 23, 2016, 91 days later.
Courts strictly enforce the 90 day filing requirement, even if the plaintiff is pro se. Shelton v. Atlantic Bingo Supply Co., Civil Action No. DKC-11-0952, 2011 WL 4985277, at *2 (D.Md. 2011); Harvey v. New Bern Police Dep't, 813 F.2d 652, 654 (4th Cir. 1987). The equitable tolling doctrine does not apply. See Irwin v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 96 (1990). Moreover, plaintiff, has not established that she acted with "due diligence" but only concentrates upon the final hours of her late filing.
A separate order granting defendants' motion is being entered herewith.