HEREDIA v. BOYD

Case No. 16-cv-04031-HRL.

ERNESTO M. HEREDIA, Plaintiff, v. ANA BOYD, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernesto M. Heredia, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Ana Boyd, Defendant, represented by Fenn C. Horton, III , Pahl & McKay.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.

Pro se plaintiff in the above-entitled matter failed to oppose defendants' motion to dismiss his complaint, failed to file an amended complaint by the deadline ordered by the court, and failed to submit a Case Management Conference statement. As a result, the court hereby vacates the Case Management Conference scheduled for February 14, 2017, and issues this order to show cause why plaintiff's claims should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The hearing on the order to show cause will be held February 21, 2017, at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor, 280 South First Street, San Jose, CA. If plaintiff fails to appear, the case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases