IN RE ROCKET FUEL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

Case No. 14-cv-03998-PJH.

IN RE ROCKET FUEL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Cause: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Nature of Suit: 850 Securities / Commodities
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nipu Shah, Plaintiff, represented by Ramzi Abadou , Kahn Swick Foti LLP.

Institutional Investor Group, Plaintiff, represented by Laurence D. King , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Mario Man-Lung Choi , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Ramzi Abadou , Kahn Swick Foti LLP & Alexander Louis Burns , Kahn Swick Foti LLC.

Rocket Fuel Inc., Defendant, represented by Evan L. Seite , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati PC, Joni L. Ostler , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati & Rodney Grant Strickland, Jr. , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

George H. John, Defendant, represented by Evan L. Seite , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati PC, Joni L. Ostler , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati & Rodney Grant Strickland, Jr. , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

J. Peter Bardwick, Defendant, represented by Evan L. Seite , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati PC, Joni L. Ostler , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati & Rodney Grant Strickland, Jr. , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

Richard Frankel, Defendant, represented by Nina F. Locker , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Evan L. Seite , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich and Rosati PC, Joni L. Ostler , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati & Rodney Grant Strickland, Jr. , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati.

Harry Quan, Movant, represented by Laurence M. Rosen , The Rosen Law Firm, P.A..

Ajay Goel, Movant, represented by Patrice L. Bishop , Stull, Stull & Brody.

Victor Veloso, Movant, represented by Patrice L. Bishop , Stull, Stull & Brody.

Thirukumaran Velayudhan, Movant, represented by David E. Azar , Milberg LLP.

Bernie Bowden, Movant, represented by David E. Azar , Milberg LLP.

James Summers, Movant, represented by Evan Jason Smith , Brodsky & Smith LLC.

Sanjiv Mehrotra, Movant, represented by Robert Vincent Prongay , Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP.

State-Boston Retirement System, Movant, represented by Bruce W. Leppla , Leiff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein.

Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System, Movant, represented by Laurence D. King , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Donald R. Hall , Kaplan Fox and Kilsheimer, Joel B. Strauss , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Joseph Scott St. John , Kahn Swick Foti LLC, Mario Man-Lung Choi , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP & Ramzi Abadou , Kahn Swick Foti LLP.

Browder Capital, LLC, Movant, represented by Laurence D. King , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Donald R. Hall , Kaplan Fox and Kilsheimer, Joel B. Strauss , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Joseph Scott St. John , Kahn Swick Foti LLC, Mario Man-Lung Choi , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP & Ramzi Abadou , Kahn Swick Foti LLP.

Patrick Browder, Movant, represented by Laurence D. King , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Donald R. Hall , Kaplan Fox and Kilsheimer, Joel B. Strauss , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, Joseph Scott St. John , Kahn Swick Foti LLC, Mario Man-Lung Choi , Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP & Ramzi Abadou , Kahn Swick Foti LLP.

William Pack, Movant, represented by Frank James Johnson , Johnson & Weaver, LLP.

Michael McCawley, Movant, represented by Michael Stuart Strimling , Bramson Plutzik Mahler & Birkhaeuser, LLP.

Mohr David Ventures, Objector, represented by Heather Annette Dunn Navarro , Five Palo Alto Square.


ORDER RE: REFILING OF DOCUMENTS LODGED UNDER SEAL

Re: Dkt. No. 210

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.

On January 24, 2017, the court denied all of the parties' motions for leave to file under seal (Dkt. 183, 195, 201), permitting only the redaction of employee names, the names of specific third-party clients of Rocket Fuel, and the (partial) sealing of two technical documents. Dkt. 210 at 11. The court ordered the parties to refile their briefs and supporting papers on the public docket, with appropriate redactions, within 14 days of the court's ruling. Id. at 11-12. Refiling was therefore due by February 7, 2017. On that day, lead plaintiffs publicly refiled their papers in accordance with the court's order. Dkt. 213.

Defendants have refiled redacted versions of two of the documents that it conditionally filed under seal in their entirety: Exhibits 6 and 7 to the Mitchell Declaration (Dkt. 195-1). Dkt. 211, 212. However, defendants have not publicly refiled Exhibits 8, 9, and 10 to the Mitchell Declaration, which were also conditionally filed under seal. See Dkt. 195-10, 195-11, 195-12. Defendants shall publicly refile appropriately redacted versions of these documents forthwith, in accordance with the court's prior order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases