ELEM INDIAN COLONY OF POMO INDIANS OF THE SULPHUR BANK RANCHERIA v. CEIBA LEGAL, LLP

No. C 16-03081 WHA.

ELEM INDIAN COLONY OF POMO INDIANS OF THE SULPHUR BANK RANCHERIA, a federally recognized Indian tribe, Plaintiff, v. CEIBA LEGAL, LLP, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cause: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer / Corrupt Organization
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory Todd Fayard , Klinedinst PC.

Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew John Alfonso , Klinedinst PC.

Ceiba Legal, LLP, Defendant, represented by Ian Robert Barker , Dentons US LLP, Little Fawn Boland , CEIBA LEGAL, LLP & Paula Marie Yost , Dentons US LLP.

Michael Hunter, Defendant, represented by Michael Vaughn Brady , Brady & Vinding, Michael Erik Vinding , Brady & Vinding, Ian Robert Barker , Dentons US LLP & Little Fawn Boland , CEIBA LEGAL, LLP.

Anthony Steele, Defendant, represented by Michael Vaughn Brady , Brady & Vinding, Michael Erik Vinding , Brady & Vinding, Ian Robert Barker , Dentons US LLP & Little Fawn Boland , CEIBA LEGAL, LLP.

David Brown, Defendant, represented by Michael Vaughn Brady , Brady & Vinding, Michael Erik Vinding , Brady & Vinding, Ian Robert Barker , Dentons US LLP & Little Fawn Boland , CEIBA LEGAL, LLP.

Adrian John, Defendant, represented by Michael Vaughn Brady , Brady & Vinding, Michael Erik Vinding , Brady & Vinding, Ian Robert Barker , Dentons US LLP & Little Fawn Boland , CEIBA LEGAL, LLP.

Natalie Sedano Garcia, Defendant, represented by Michael Vaughn Brady , Brady & Vinding, Michael Erik Vinding , Brady & Vinding, Ian Robert Barker , Dentons US LLP & Little Fawn Boland , CEIBA LEGAL, LLP.

Kiuya Brown, Defendant, represented by Michael Vaughn Brady , Brady & Vinding, Michael Erik Vinding , Brady & Vinding, Ian Robert Barker , Dentons US LLP & Little Fawn Boland , CEIBA LEGAL, LLP.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

A prior order awarded defendants attorney's fees and directed both sides to either unequivocally accept the amount of the fee award — while preserving the question of entitlement to said award — or request appointment of a special master to further evaluate the same (Dkt. No. 83). Plaintiff accepted the amount awarded (Dkt. No. 85), but defendants requested either appointment of a special master or more time to reach "an agreement that would make further litigation over the [fee] award unnecessary" (Dkt. No. 86). Per defendants' request, the deadline for both sides to file their statements regarding the amount awarded is extended from February 9 to FEBRUARY 17 AT NOON.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases