JOHNSON v. FREIHEIT

No. 2:16-cv-01932-TLN-AC.

SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. H. ROBERT FREIHEIT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Nature of Suit: 446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott Johnson, Plaintiff, represented by Dennis J. Price , Center for Disability Access.

Scott Johnson, Plaintiff, represented by Mark D. Potter , Center for Disability Access & Phyl Grace , Center for Disability Access.

H. Robert Freiheit, Defendant, represented by Cris C. Vaughan , Vaughan & Associates.

Denise Ann Freiheit, Defendant, represented by Cris C. Vaughan , Vaughan & Associates.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this disability access case asserting a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and related state law claims, and defendant has answered the complaint.

In the interest of avoiding the accumulation of fees and costs through potentially unnecessary discovery and motion practice, and to allow the parties some time to pursue an early informal resolution of this matter, the court finds it appropriate to temporarily stay and refer the action to the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program ("VDRP").

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is STAYED and REFERRED to the VDRP. 2. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, the parties shall contact the court's VDRP administrator, Sujean Park, at (916) 930-4278 or SPark@caed.uscourts.gov, to start the process of selecting an appropriate neutral. 3. The parties shall carefully review and comply with Local Rule 271, which outlines the specifications and requirements of the VDRP. 4. No later than fourteen (14) days after completion of the VDRP session, the parties shall jointly file their VDRP Completion Report, consistent with Local Rule 271(o). 5. Any party that objects to this referral to the VDRP shall file its objections within seven (7) days of this order. Such objections shall clearly outline why that party believes that the action is not appropriate for referral to the VDRP.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases