WILLARD v. NEIBERT

Case No. 1:14-cv-1951-AWI-SAB (PC).

JOSHUA A. WILLARD, Plaintiff, v. J. NEIBERT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joshua A. Willard, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

J. Neibert, Defendant, represented by Andrew James Whisnand , Office of the Attorney General.

L. Lara, Defendant, represented by Andrew James Whisnand , Office of the Attorney General.

J. Loveall, Defendant, represented by Andrew James Whisnand , Office of the Attorney General.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S SURREPLY, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

[ECF Nos. 37, 43, 44]

ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Joshua A. Willard is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 5, 2016, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment.

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 1, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was served on the parties and contained notice that objections were to be filed within thirty days. Over thirty days have passed, and no objections were filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court has reviewed the matter. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on December 1, 2016 (Doc. 44), are adopted in full; 2. Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiff's surreply (Doc. 43) is granted; 3. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied (Doc. 37); and 4. The matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for trial scheduling.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases