SOLIS-DIAZ v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT

No. 2:12-cv-00619-JAD-GWF.

JUAN SOLIS-DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Juan Solis-Diaz, Plaintiff, represented by Kirk T. Kennedy , Kirk T. Kennedy.

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Defendant, represented by Craig R. Anderson , Marquis & Aurbach.

Officer S. Tompkins, Defendant, represented by Craig R. Anderson , Marquis & Aurbach.


STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE

JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between, the Plaintiff, JUAN SOLIS-DIAZ, by and through his undersigned counsel, KIRK T. KENNEDY, ESQ., and the Defendants, LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT AND OFFICER SCOTT TOMPKINS, by and through their undersigned counsel, CRAIG R. ANDERSON, ESQ., that the following stipulation will govern the admission of certain evidence at trial:

1. All records and billing incurred and related to the Sunrise Hospital treatment for Plaintiff is admitted and may be used by either party for any purpose, this includes the records and billing from the following: Medic West Ambulance, Valley Anes Cons Beckett, Lab Medicine Consultants, Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, Desert Surgical Associates, University Medical Center, Anesthesiology Consultants, Inc., Nevada Orthopedic & Spine Center, Dr Arthur Taylor, Radiology Specialists, Ltd., David A. Silverberg, M.D., Redrock Medical Center and Dr. Kim Kitae.

2. The parties agree that the Plaintiff's medical treatment at Sunrise Hospital was reasonable, necessary and appropriate.

3. The parties agree to the admission of the records and billing related to Plaintiff's right hand nerve treatment with Dr. Maria Stella Gaerlan, and that her treatment was reasonable, necessary and appropriate.

4. The parties agree that the Plaintiff will make no damage claim for the necessity of future medical treatment from his injuries in this matter, however the Plaintiff may present evidence that the did suffer related and ongoing pain and suffering arising from the underlying injuries after his medical treatment.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases