BAYS v. FRONTIER FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION

Case No. 3:16-cv-656-HDM-WGC.

MICHELLE M. BAYS, Plaintiff, v. FRONTIER FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, Inc. and TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michelle M. Bays, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Kind , Kazerouni Law Group, APC.

Michelle M. Bays, Plaintiff, represented by Sara Khosroabadi , Hyde & Swigart.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrea Mazingo , Jones Day, pro hac vice & Jennifer L. Braster , Maupin Naylor Braster.

Trans Union LLC, Defendant, represented by Darrell D. Dennis , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP & Jason Revzin , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP.

Frontier Financial Credit Union, Defendant, represented by Michael C. Lehners , Law Office of Michael Lehners, Richard G. Hill , Law Office of Richard Hill & Sophie A. Karadanis , Richard G. Hill, Ltd..


ORDER GRANTING EMERGENCY EX-PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge.

COMES NOW Defendant, Frontier Financial Credit Union (FFCU), by and through undersigned counsel and files the following Emergency Ex-Parte Motion for Extension of Time to File its Reply Brief to the Plaintiff's Response to FFCU's Motion to Dismiss and to Stay. This motion is made and based upon the pleadings on file herein and the Memorandum of Points and Authorities attached hereto.

FFCU filed a motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's state law claims (ECF 22) and a motion to abstain under the Younger Abstention Doctrine (ECF 23). FFCU granted the Plaintiff an extension to file her opposition to these motions. The Plaintiff timely filed responses on January 2, 2017 to both motions (ECF 38 and 39). FFCU's reply is due January 9, 2017.

FFCU is requesting a one week extension to file its replies based upon an emergency that is affecting its counsel. Mr. Lehners rents a shop in the industrial area of Sparks. The shop is off of East Greg Street, near the railroad tracks. This area is in a flood zone. The weather service has predicted massive flooding of this area over the weekend. Mr. Lehners had planned to research and draft replies over the weekend, but instead he has to move equipment and vehicles from the shop. He also has to sandbag the shop to prevent flood damage.

By his signature below, Mr. Lehners certifies that this motion is not made for purposes of delay. Mr. Lehners cannot reach counsel for the Credit Union, co-defendants, because they are on the east coast, and he has left a voicemail for plaintiff's counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases