DENT v. HULL

Civil Action No. 3:15CV646-HEH.

DAVID W. DENT, Plaintiff, v. TED HULL, etal. Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Dent, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Ted Hull, Defendant, represented by Alexander Francuzenko , Cook Craig & Francuzenko PLLC.

Phillis Back, Defendant, represented by Alexander Francuzenko , Cook Craig & Francuzenko PLLC.


MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

HENRY E. HUDSON, District Judge.

By Memorandum Order entered on November 13, 2015, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. At that time, the Court warned Plaintiff that he must keep the Court informed as to his current address or if he was released. On February 6, 2017, the Court received a letter from the Northern Neck Regional Jail notifying the Court that Dent was released from the jail's custody as of January 31, 2017. Since that date. Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiff's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases